Search for: "Application of Jackson"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
Have the dissenting opinions (by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson) abandoned the idea that racial diversity in the classroom is supposed to benefit everyone by undermining stereotypes and widening the range of viewpoints? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:03 am
First, the evidence is overwhelming that Harvard actively discriminated against Asian applicants. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Thankfully, Justice Jackson in particular did highlight some of those benefits. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
The crudeness of the racial and ethnic categories used by Harvard and UNC also undercut Justice Jackson's otherwise powerful appeal to the historic disadvantages faced by African-Americans. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
Justice Jackson dissent was related to the North Carolina case. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:29 am
If you have questions as to whether an H-1B amended petition is necessary, please reach out to your Jackson Lewis attorney. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
Justice Alito authored the opinion for the Court and Justices Jackson and Sotomayor each filed concurring opinions—though Sotomayor’s concurrence reads more like a dissent. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
Justice Alito authored the opinion for the Court and Justices Jackson and Sotomayor each filed concurring opinions—though Sotomayor’s concurrence reads more like a dissent. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
A benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former group at the expense of the latter. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Readers then make a written recommendation on each assigned application, and they may provide an applicant a substantial “plus” depending on the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Readers then make a written recommendation on each assigned application, and they may provide an applicant a substantial “plus” depending on the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson, joined the Court's opinion but added, among other things: Petitioner Gerald Groff asks this Court to overrule Hardison and to replace it with a "significant difficulty or expense" standard. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:27 am
Chris Jackson and Annaleise Azevedo Lohr report for Ipsos. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:05 pm
As Justices Jackson and Sotomayor correctly note in their dissent, by “depart[ing] from ordinary principles of statutory interpretation,” the Court “avoids having to invalidate this statute under our well-established First Amendment overbreadth doctrine” and thus “subverts the speech-protective goals” of that constitutional doctrine. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
And in this consent-based track, the five Justices also seem to agree that federalism concerns are no longer applicable. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm
Ill. 2020), Jackson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm
The overbreadth doctrine requires courts to consider how much of a statute’s application is constitutional versus unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
In rejecting the claim that Texas has standing, the majority relied on general principles applicable to all plaintiffs. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
Justice Kavanaugh wrote for the Court, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. [read post]
