Search for: "BES v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 68,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:01 am
Under Maryland law, there are only three limited exceptions to the final judgment requirement, the first being appeals from interlocutory orders specifically allowed by statute, the second being immediate appeals permitted under Maryland Rule 2-602, and the final being appeals allowed under the common law collateral order doctrine. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:34 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Judge Piazza held that the 8th Circuit's decision pre-dated the seminal SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor.Arkansas' ban on same-sex marriage is also being challenged in federal court in the case of Jernigan v Crane; the federal judge in that case is currently considering AG McDaniel's motion for summary judgment.So the same-sex civil rights saga continues across the nation. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:31 pm
Gonzalez made it easier for some immigrants convicted of drug possession under state law to remain in the United States rather than being subject to deportation. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by Nasir Pasha, Esq.
San Antonio is repeatedly being challenged by the State of Texas over what has obviously become a cultural, social, and political chasm between city and state in how it administers legal affairs. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
He was arrested two years later after being unable to pay that $498, and spent five months in jail at a cost of more than $3,000 to the City of New Orleans. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:46 am by Bexis
  Given this fact, we thought we'd point out to our readers the recent Ninth Circuit decision in Rosa v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]