Search for: "Baker Surveillance "
Results 321 - 340
of 684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 10:28 am
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast featuring a debate with Harriet Moynihan over the application of international law to cyberattacks. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:32 am
Jack Goldsmith flagged a report of an “Internet of things-style surveillance network. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Jillian Ventura analyzed the most controversial components of the Investigatory Powers Bill, Britain's overhaul of its surveillance laws. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 7:15 am
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring an interview with Kim Zetter, journalist and author on cybersecurity and national security topics, about the domestic “gap” in cybersecurity surveillance: Abby Lemert and Eleanor Runde examined the latest U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 7:58 am
Courts on Activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts, as required by the USA FREEDOM Act. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
And Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast featuring discussion of Federal Trade Commission negotiations with Facebook over a major fine, Trump’s artificial intelligence executive order and more: Mary McCord and Eric Tirschwell discussed the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms’s prohibition on bump stocks. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am
In a paper for the Hoover Institution’s Aegis series, Barry Friedman provided a constitutional argument concerning the unauthorized digital collection and surveillance data for police investigations. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:42 am
Stewart Baker shared a special edition of the Cyberlaw Podcast, in which Bob Litt, David Kris and Bobby Chesney comment on the inspector general's report and ways to improve the FISA process: On this week’s episode of Rational Security, the hosts also covered the inspector general's report, in addition to discussing U.S. corporate involvement in constructing a domestic surveillance system in the United Arab Emirates and how a Senate impeachment trial might work: … [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 10:06 am
” Alan Rozenshtein argued that aggressive disease surveillance—with the right safeguards—is likely permissible under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am
Stewart Baker shared the Cyberlaw Podcast's news roundup. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 12:24 pm
Henry Farrell and Abraham Newman argued that Schrems II provides a valuable opportunity for the U.S. to reconsider its approach to surveillance for national security and provide reciprocal privacy rights to the citizens of other democracies. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 9:02 am
Chinese border authorities routinely install a surveillance app on tourists’ phones when they enter Xinjiang, the Times reports. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
Peter Swire summarized his testimony before the Irish High Court on oversight of U.S. surveillance law. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:16 am
Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jack Goldsmith spoke with Bart Gellman, author of the new book, “Dark Mirror: Edward Snowden and the American Surveillance State”: Stewart Baker also shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast featuring an interview with Bart Gellman: Setzer shared Judge Emmet Sullivan’s brief submitted to the D.C. [read post]
9 May 2020, 8:31 am
Elena Chachko discussed the Israeli Supreme Court’s recent decision checking COVID-19 electronic surveillance. [read post]
16 May 2020, 8:23 am
Taylor analyzed five amendments to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act reform that the Senate voted on this week. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 4:28 am
-China tech news, focusing primarily on new reports about the detention and surveillance programs in Xinjiang. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:59 am
The law firm of Lipscomb, Eisenberg, and Baker coordinates Malibu Media's lawsuit campaign - 1,078 lawsuits and counting since May, 2012. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:15 pm
Stewart Baker posted the Cyberlaw Podcast featuring Mara Hvistendahl. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 5:48 am
Alan Rozenshtein argued that the government’s best defense of a digital surveillance system in the interest of public health would rely on the “special needs” exemption to the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
