Search for: "Banning Company v. California" Results 321 - 340 of 1,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 6:32 am by Christopher Brumwell
  This holding leaves the states with no clear way to ban contracts that insulate companies from liability through class proceeding waivers. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:51 pm by Barry Barnett
  The Ninth Circuit applied California law to declare a class arbitration ban in AT&T Mobility's subscriber agreement unconscionable and therefore void. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:56 am by Nassiri Law
  In 2008, Eich had donated $1,000 to support California’s Proposition 8, which would have banned same sex marriage in the state. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
IN THE NEWS California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two bills into law banning people from carrying firearms in public places and raising taxes on guns and ammunition sold in the state. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed suits filed by the cities of Oakland and San Francisco against five oil companies over the costs of rising sea levels allegedly accelerated by the companies’ contribution to climate change. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:55 am by randal shaheen
This concern exists in spite of the fact that the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Automotive Wholesalers’ Ass’n of New England, 37 F.3d 12, 19 (1st Cir. 1994) (“public accommodations” encompasses more than actual physical structures and included defendant insurance company); Pallozzi v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am by Amy Howe
California, the government will provide its views on the constitutionality of California’s “doing business” tax – which, Arizona says, is so broad that it taxes out-of-state companies that don’t have any connection to California except “purely passive investment” in a limited-liability company doing business in California. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Oregon law apparently doesn't ban public urination -- but it does ban littering, especially when it "create[s] an objectionable stench. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
For a (rare) example in which one of these statutes comes up, see Davis v. [read post]