Search for: "Barnett v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 1,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am by Marty Lederman
 Barnette].So far, so good:  If the state compels an individual to actually say something that betrays her convictions--the classic case being the compulsion of the young Jehovah's Witness students in Barnette to attest their allegiance to the United States, contrary to their genuine beliefs--there's a First Amendment problem. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
ICYMI: Recent assessments of the Supreme Court's attempt to distinguish Korematsu from Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by William Hibbitts
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning, and for this reason, one of our landmark free speech cases [West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm by Jennifer Mascott
” The Lucia opinion suggests that this “continuing position” element — emphasized in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:23 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Today marks the 75th anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Howard Wasserman
Although it did not deal with compelled speech on the anniversary of Barnette, the Court did knock out one of its free-speech cases--Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Justice Gorsuch’s solo dissent from Monday’s ruling in Sveen v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court predictably handed down the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
Quoting West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Sandy Levinson
 I think that the interpretations being offered of Article V make an already dreadful article even worse. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Sandy Levinson
  For some this involves expansion of the welfare state; for others, like devotees of Richard Epstein and Randy Barnett, it could lead to the invalidation of the New Deal, but both the Federalist Society and the American Constitution Society seemingly agree that the focus of our attention should be on the judiciary and on reinforcing the view that the Constitution is just terrific and needs only correct interpretation by honorable judges. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Steven Barnett considered the influence of the press on the decision here. [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:04 am by Walter Olson
” Two views of the recent case Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The US State Department is to collect via applicants’ social media information for tracking and security purposes – the Social Media Law Bulletin has coverage. [read post]