Search for: "Bates v. AT" Results 321 - 340 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 12:42 pm by Lev Sugarman
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Jeremy Gordon summarized McKeever v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 11:01 am by Anushka Limaye
Sarah Grant gave a comprehensive summary of updates from the Court of Military Commission Review, specifically discussing the reversal of the abatement in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
This type of situation is what the Supreme Court was talking about in Bates v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:27 pm
The  Guanantamo prisoners, of course, have a constitutional right to file habeas cases against their detention, under the Supreme Court’s decision last June in Boumediene v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:39 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
La licenciada Karla Stirling, víctima del robo de identidad, no atiende casos criminales ni litiga mucho en los tribunales; y aunque tiene licencia para ejercer en el estado de Utah, practica primariamente en California. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:02 am by Aimee Czachorowski
Why this case is noteworthy:  The Court of Chancery provides a must-read primer on privilege and redaction logs – – and penalties for non-compliance – – in a decision on a motion to compel in Mechel Bluestone, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
Media lawyers have been waiting with bated breath for judicial interpretation of the 2013 Act; in particular Section 1(1). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
In support of his contention that the LVT could entertain such a challenge within its jurisdiction Mr Bates relied on Jonathan Parker LJ in Ruddy v Oakfern Properties [2006] EWCA Civ 1389: In my judgment there is no justification for implying any restriction in the entirely general words of section 27A of the [Landlord and Tenant Act 1985]. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
In support of his contention that the LVT could entertain such a challenge within its jurisdiction Mr Bates relied on Jonathan Parker LJ in Ruddy v Oakfern Properties [2006] EWCA Civ 1389: In my judgment there is no justification for implying any restriction in the entirely general words of section 27A of the [Landlord and Tenant Act 1985]. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]