Search for: "Bates v. Bates"
Results 321 - 340
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2018, 1:46 pm
Ross v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
Dan Maurer was thinking about the military commissions too: Considering the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ortiz v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
Chavakula v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
In other ECHR news, Chinmayi Sharma summarized the court’s ruling in Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
This type of situation is what the Supreme Court was talking about in Bates v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm
Kinexus Representative LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
Bates said in a 21-page opinion issued today. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
Helden v Strathmore [2011] EWCA Civ 542 contains lots of useful footnotes and pointers on different issues, so it’s worth a read. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:40 am
Helden v Strathmore [2011] EWCA Civ 542 contains lots of useful footnotes and pointers on different issues, so it’s worth a read. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Bainbridge, earlier on Quality Egg/U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:21 pm
Cichowski, Civil Society and the European Court of Human RightsAnthony Lester, The European Court of Human Rights after 50 YearsRobert Harmsen, The Reform of the Convention System: Institutional Restructuring and the (Geo-)Politics of Human RightsStéphanie Hennette-Vauchez, Constitutional v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:58 am
American Forest Resource Council v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In its decision in OPO v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:13 am
Circuit came out the other way in a 2-1 decision in Halbig v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 11:18 am
The Court of Chancery recently reiterated its expectations of Delaware discovery conduct at a hearing in Medicalgorithmics S.A. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
I was in Washington earlier today to watch oral arguments in Ricci v. [read post]
