Search for: "Becker v. Becker" Results 321 - 340 of 920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 6:42 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    In the Name of "Fairness," a New Jersey Federal Court Strikes the Confidentiality and Release Provisions from a Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement Agreement from Epstein Becker Green: Doug Weiner and Meg Thering look at the recent Brumley v. [read post]
 In the meantime, Epstein Becker Green has created a checklist employers can use to get and stay ahead of these issues. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Young, P.C., 121 AD3d 969, 969 [2014]; see Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d 733, 734-735 [2015]; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796 [2013]). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Young, P.C., 121 AD3d 969, 969; see Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d 733, 734-735; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796). [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
That was so even though it was common practice in the beauty products sector to market products either under a combination of surnames and first names or alternatively under one or the other.The decision in Case C-51/09 Becker v Harman International Industries (BARBARA BECKER v BECKER) could apply by analogy to this controversy in order to conclude that a likelihood of confusion does not automatically exist 'when the earlier mark consists of a… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
In relation to Lilly’s contention that claim 1 was obvious over European Patent Application No. 0 613 007 A2 (“Becker”) published on 31 August 1994, Arnold J noted: I shall deal with this very briefly, since in my opinion it is manifest that claim 1 cannot be obvious over Becker if it is not obvious over Konig. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:19 am
Becker, The "Presumption of Impartiality" and other Errors in the International Criminal Court's Plenary Decision Concerning Judicial Disqualification of the President of the Court in The Prosecutor v. [read post]