Search for: "Best v. Perry"
Results 321 - 340
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
Supreme Court’s standing ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court case that decided the presidential election, and by David Boies, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the same case.The case is Perry et al v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
Rick Perry and others. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm
Perry, but to strike down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:47 am
Famed litigators Ted Olson and David Boies argue Prop 8 before the court in Perry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am
" TRW Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The proponents’ best argument (although they don’t quite frame it this way), is that because it would be likely unlawful under federal law for Judge Walker to have granted relief to persons who weren’t plaintiffs, we should in effect add the words “as to the named plaintiffs” to his directive to the LA and Alameda Clerks. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” On the other hand, Adam Peck writes for ThinkProgress that “already anti-women activists are plotting how best to take advantage of a weakened judicial branch in order to undermine access to safe abortions. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
They are-Hollingsworth v Perry (rejecting an appeal of the lower court decision overturning California's Proposition 8, on technical jurisdictional grounds), and US v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
” Perales won League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
Even in light of the textual and other points to which Professor Tribe draws our attention, the Supreme Court inProfessor Buchanan argues for his conclusion as follows: he contends that, in Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
And the conclusion of Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:25 am
When the Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
Perry, 142 N.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Boren, 1976); unmarried individuals (Eisenstadt v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Perry. [read post]
