Search for: "Bird v Bird"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2005, 4:27 pm
Back in July, I compared Google Maps v. [read post]
14 Dec 2005, 4:27 pm
Back in July, I compared Google Maps v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:11 am
" In it I reproduced the text of a famous fictional decision from Canada's Court of Criminal Appeals, known to every law student, which goes by the name of Regina v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:33 am
Ahold Licensing SA v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
The Protect Our Communities Foundation v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:35 am
S.2577 - A bill to amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to clarify the treatment of authentic Alaska Native articles of handicraft containing nonedible migratory bird parts, and for other purposes. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
More precisely, the act bans “force feed[ing] a bird for the purpose of enlarging the bird's liver beyond normal size, or hir[ing] another person to do so,” Calif. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am
In Misleh v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
As well as the attitude of the Court towards these cases.Many justices on the California Supreme Court have "learned a lesson" from the Rose Bird recall and have adopted a correlative attitude when dealing with death penalty cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:26 am
As we know from "Annals of Trademark Law: It's a Bird! [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Ontario v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:55 am
Unsurprisingly, DirecTV filed its petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc on August 9th, seeking rehearing of the Cappuccitti v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
Tristan Sherliker (Bird & Bird) reports on a recent decision of Mr Justice Birss in Accord Healthcare Ltd v Research Corporation Technologies Inc [2017] EWHC 2711 on the issue. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:14 am
Picture on left is scanned by Philip V. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
AmeriKat Annsley Merelle Ward provides a summary: BREAKING: "Specifically, precisely and individually identifiable", AG Wathelet adds to the Article 3(a) SPC Regulation wrangle.Tristan Sherliker from Bird & Bird reports on the recent decision from the Beijing High Court in IWNCOMM v Sony, which has provided insights on how Chinese legal system interprets FRAND licensing obligations in telecoms cases and gives guidance on how to conduct FRAND… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
S. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:08 pm
Filed in November 2011, Watson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:00 pm
” This was a very impressive and timely panel, consisting of parters specializing in executive compensation from Milbank Twed Hadley & McCloy LLP and Alston & Bird LLP as well as a principal from the compensation consulting company, Compensia Inc. [read post]
23 May 2018, 1:40 pm
In a February 2018 U.S. district court decision from Alabama, Bocage v. [read post]
