Search for: "Black v. Court of Appeals et al" Results 321 - 340 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
They still haven’t received the awarded records, and it’s possible that Augusta County will appeal. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Social psychology is the main source of the creativity literature—Teresa Amabile et al. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm by Jason Kelley
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
The barristers, attired in their black gowns and white wing collars, carry with them the dignity of their proud positions. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts: Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:44 am by Jessica Smith
Paul Heaton et al., The Downstream Consequences of Misdemeanor Pretrial Detention, 69 Stanford Law Review 711, 718 (2017) [hereinafter Downstream Consequences]. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
Garland requested over $95,000 of compensation and with consent of counsel on further appeal he eventually received $95,000 in the form of disbursement.[23] Although there was no precedent for an award of such an amount in Ontario, the presiding Justice Cullity was satisfied with Mr. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In light of the Supreme Court decision this week in Kimbrough v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This is true even though the United States Supreme Court and the Canadian Supreme Court have different jurisprudence on freedom of religion. [read post]