Search for: "Board of Review v. Second Judicial District Court" Results 321 - 340 of 821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm by Thomas Hopson
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am by Big Tent Democrat
A review of the Court's decision in Parents Involved demonstrates the stakes. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  The United States is not injured by the judgment it is asking the Court to review. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:53 am by Patricia Salkin
The court found Fitanides’s argument that the ZBA lacked authority to remand the permit to the Planning Board for amendment irrelevant because it reviewed the decision of the Planning Board directly. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
(National Labor Relations Review Board v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
However, in one, Patton v British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board, 2020 BCSC 554 (“Patton”), the court simply noted that Vavilov had not affected any of the matters at issue in that case. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 3:18 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITLabor Law Panel Adopts Special Master's Recommendations In Upholding Fines on Labor Union for Civil Contempt National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
Second, the court misread Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in Kerry v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:04 pm by Larkin Reynolds
It also said, however, that Petitioners could present evidence to the district court on whether the government had attempted to manipulate judicial review–a suggestion it had not addressed in the merits ruling. [read post]
POLICE OFFICER GETS SECOND CHANCE TO (S)ELECT GRIEVANCE PROCESS UPON REMANDCity of Desoto, Tx v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
This case presents issues concerning the standard and scope of judicial review under the California Environmental Quality Act. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:41 am
” Petitioners sought judicial review of that decision in federal district court, which vacated the arbitrators’ decision. [read post]