Search for: "Bond v. Bond" Results 321 - 340 of 6,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 10:56 am by Abbe Gluck
  The principle is a first-cousin of the presumption against preemption (which has been around at least since the 1930s) and was itself announced in Gregory v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:03 am by tracey
Assénagon Asset Management SA v Irish Bank Resolution Corpn Ltd: [2012] EWHC 2090 (Ch);  [2012] WLR (D)  243 “A challenge to the legality of a technique used by the issuers of corporate bonds which had acquired the label ‘exit consent’ succeeded on the ground that it was not lawful for the majority bondholders to lend its aid to the coercion of a minority by voting for a resolution which expropriated the minority’s rights… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 2:03 am by Immigration Prof
For commentary on the Supreme Court's decision this week Nielsen v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 3:40 am by Immigration Prof
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Jennings v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 6:08 am by John Jascob
The panel went on to affirm that one of the appellants used false zip codes to appear as a retail investor and confirmed that the penalties and injunctions imposed were within the district court's discretion (SEC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:19 am by Adam Weinstein
The steep decline in prices of Puerto Rican bonds has caused local investors substantial investment losses in assets that many are claiming were sold to them as safe and secure bonds. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
Earlier this month, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court held in Illinois State Treasurer v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:50 am by Mitu Gulati
  As Yannis explains by digging deep into the most important of these cases – the Mamatas and Others v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by Paul Caron
Weiss (J.D. 2011, Washington University) has published Fixed Income Insecurities: Municipal Bonds and the Erosion of Dormant Commerce Clause Scrutiny in Department of Revenue v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:56 am by Ted Frank
In a brief full of ad hominem attacks on me and my client, class counsel asked for an $8.3 million appeal bond, requesting millions of dollars of expenses that the D.C. [read post]