Search for: "Bower v. Bower" Results 321 - 340 of 621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2017, 6:34 am by Eric Goldman
As a result, the court doesn’t discuss any of the thorny conceptual issues about how CC licenses are formed or the contract/conditions-on-copyright divide exposed by the Federal Circuit’s Bowers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Next is the current relist king, the four-time relisted Bower v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:37 pm
We have known since the Federal Circuit's decision in Bowers v. [read post]
   In Oregon, there is the case of  In re Bower, 07-60126-fra7 (Bankr.Or. 7/26/2007) (Bankr.Or., 2007), where the judge refused to approve the reaffirmation because it did not help the debtor’s fresh start. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
Separate opinion utility Looking back at some of the most impactful dissents as measured using Cole’s criteria, Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent from Bowers v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:30 am
"I think the corporations are going to prevail," says Altman Weil's Ward Bower. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am by William Appleton
Anna Bower detailed the events of a Nov. 22 hearing before the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the Justice Department’s appeal of U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 1:43 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Anna Bower reported on Fulton County’s Aug. 16 hearing regarding the subpoena of former Trump campaign lawyer Jenna Ellis. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Pollard
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:10 am by Anushka Limaye
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons learned from Doe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 5:45 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anna Bower reported on Fulton County’s Aug. 16 hearing regarding the subpoena of former Trump campaign lawyer Jenna Ellis. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:19 am by Christine Corcos
Even if the Supreme Court itself never acknowledges Dobbs’s selective and inaccurate account of the historical record, as it acknowledged historical errors of Bowers v. [read post]