Search for: "Brake v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2009, 7:08 am
One of the petitions granted this morning was State v. $281,420 in US Currency, No. 08-0465 (DB), in which the Texas Supreme Court had requested the views of the Solicitor General in a formal CVSG last fall. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:56 am
In today’s case (Link v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:07 am
Most recently, in EEOC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
In the case, People of the City of Plymouth v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
Torres v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:52 pm
She stated that she saw [ Plaintiff-Driver-in-front ]’s brake lights come on when he made a sudden stop, and that she applied her brakes, but she was unable to avoid colliding with [ Plaintiff-Driver-in-front ]’s vehicle [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
The style of the case is, Home Service Casualty Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 2:10 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:29 am
Kindig It Design, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:33 am
The court was unpersuaded: “If a buyer discovers that her new car’s engine is dead, or that its brakes are shot, she will not be appeased by a response that the car itself is not defective because the engine and brakes are merely components of the car. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
’ United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 am
Toyota stated in court that the 2006 Camry had a state-of-the-art braking system and had earned top safety honors. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:25 am
In Gentry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Rosenberg v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:19 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:52 am
For more information on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:44 am
In the case, Bostic v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:00 am
City State Bank v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
The trial court initially agreed with the family, by entering a judgement in their favor, but State Farm succeeded in getting the judge to rehear their argument and vacate the judgment based upon the newly-decided Florida Supreme Court case of State Farm v. [read post]
