Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 321 - 340
of 9,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Partner Nick Bolter and associate Martin Whittle authored an article for World Trademark Review discussing the decision from the High Court of England and Wales in Easygroup Ltd v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Partner Nick Bolter and associate Martin Whittle authored an article for World Trademark Review discussing the decision from the High Court of England and Wales in Easygroup Ltd v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
Partner Nick Bolter and associate Martin Whittle authored an article for World Trademark Review discussing the decision from the High Court of England and Wales in Easygroup Ltd v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 8:46 am
Starbucks claimed that consumers confused the Starpreya-branded products with its corporate and brand name. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
Moroccanoil … but no fishy oil forfeit The Moroccanoil case (Moroccanoil Israel Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd[2014] EWHC 1686 (IPEC)), by contrast, shows the weaknesses of English law when a brand owner doesn’t plan ahead and finds itself without any registered trade marks to rely upon. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:01 am
Author Wags05 Licence Copyright waived by the Author Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Nugee and Birss and Lady Justice Laing) Vestel Elektronik Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. and another v Access Advance LLC and another [2021] (26 March 2021) [2021] WLR(D) 178, [2021] EWCA Civ 440Many of the tellies that are sold in this country under such brands as Toshiba, Hitachi, Telefunken and Panasonic [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:34 am
(Fruit of the Loom, Inc. and Russell Brands, LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
An example might be a branded product that is also supplied as a supermarket product as was the case with Weetabix and Asda’s Wheat Bisks, mentioned in the Penguin v Puffin case (1997).In contrast, a product packaged to look like a familiar brand but without the same qualities and/or not made by the same company lies and sends wrong, highly misleading signals to shoppers. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:55 am
In Gonzales et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:05 am
(Remember Fraley v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 6:07 am
Thomas (renamed Capitol v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:47 am
., et. al. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:30 am
@afroip You have a firm claiming to be a reseller of a brand but then doesn't honor the brands product warranty fully. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:11 am
In Darst, Trustee v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 7:44 am
” Cites to Tiffany v. eBay and Sellify v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:47 am
Law Lessons from STEVEN BRANDES V. [read post]
4 May 2017, 7:20 pm
.], v. 3, p. 14-41, apr. 2017. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:34 am
We are currently waiting for a decision from the Supreme Court in Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor (Cartier v Sky) that will provide clarity on the enforcement process and responsibility for costs. [read post]
