Search for: "Brown v. Jackson" Results 321 - 340 of 1,079
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2008, 10:21 am
Harris    Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0072n.06 USA v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am by SHG
” Justice Brown Jackson makes a strong argument for her position, but is it beyond question? [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
Brown, The Girard Will and Twin Landmarks of Supreme Court History, 41 Journal of Supreme Court History 7-20 (2016).Carol Goforth, A Corporation Has No Soul, and Doesn't Go to Church: Relating the Doctrine of Piercing the Veil to Burwell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:20 am by Devon Westhill
In her second day of oral arguments, Jackson made a splash during the argument in Merrill v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am by Josh Blackman
In the top square, we included Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Coach Kennedy, Mary Beth Tinker, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
Feldman argues that Black, the liberal originalist; Douglas, the activist libertarian; Frankfurter, the advocate of strenuous judicial deference; and Jackson, the pragmatist; achieved greatness by developing four unique constitutional approaches, which reflected their own personalities and worldviews, although they were able to converge on common ground in Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 7:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Details: In her first term on the court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was on the liberal side, but less so than justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:21 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
By contrast, Ketanji Brown Jackson, the newest justice, has almost no prior record. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:21 am by Robert McAvoy
The NLRB argued that the Supreme Court should at least apply a more deferential approach to the “success on the merits” factor, but the majority comprised of eight justices rejected that approach, with only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson favoring a more relaxed first factor. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Thomas B. Griffith
District of Columbia, the en banc held that discriminatory job transfers are actionable under Title VII, expressly overruling its 1999 opinion in Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:57 pm by Ronald Mann
Jackson repeatedly emphasized a bankruptcy case from the 19th century (Strang v. [read post]
” Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented, with Justice Jackson writing: It is neither our job nor our prerogative to retrofit federal statutes in a manner patently inconsistent with Congress’s choices. [read post]