Search for: "Brown v. Rogers" Results 321 - 340 of 515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 9:08 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Circuit in the Guantánamo habeas litigation), Judge Janice Rogers Brown offered the following observation: As the dissenters warned and as the amount of ink spilled in this single case attests, [the Supreme Court’s] airy suppositions [in Boumediene v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)), providing violent video games to minors (Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm by Andrew Berger
Understanding the distinction between an idea and its expression is not easy The case of Rogers v Koons helps explain the distinction. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:38 am by Lyle Denniston
The lower court’s verbal attacks on Boumediene continued in the opinion released Wednesday in Latif v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Judge Janice Rogers Brown, for the majority, expressly adopts a presumption in favor of the government’s evidence in Guantanamo habeas cases–something the lower courts had declined to do on which the D.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Marissa Miller
” In an op-ed for the Houston Chronicle, Sharon Browne and Roger Clegg urge the Court to grant cert. in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
Lady Moore, the wife of actor Sir Roger Moore, accepted “substantial” undisclosed libel damages and costs from Associated Newspapers over a claim by the Daily Mail that she lived with a “playboy” in the French Riviera during her youth. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:40 pm by admin
  However, as the Supreme Court recently ruled (PDF) in Brown v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
”  Elsewhere in the ABA Journal, John Gibeaut considers the potential effects of Brown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:42 pm by Rosenbaum & Associates
Similar blog posts: West Virginia Supreme Court Finds State Nursing Home Law Preempted by Federal Arbitration Act - Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
In contrast, Lord Scott, Neuberger and Brown argued that D2 should have been liable: if the aim was to punish the victim then the method was of less relevance than the purpose. [read post]