Search for: "Brown v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,036
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 11:18 am
” Finally, MacLean seems to suggest the economist James Buchanan, the villain of the book, developed his “public choice” ideas in response to Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 6:24 pm
Key v Brown University, 2017 WL 2784864 (RI 6/27/2017)Filed under: Standing [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:55 pm
The Superior Court granted defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment and denied property owners’ cross-motion for summary judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
Superior Court of San Francisco County). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:17 pm
Thereafter, the employee filed suit in superior court. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm
Superior Court of California, No. 16-466, slip op. at 7 (U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, the justices reversed a state court finding of specific personal jurisdiction over out-of-state plaintiffs in a multistate lawsuit. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:04 pm
For his first year on the Commission he was the representative of the Conference of Superior Court Judges. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:50 pm
Crabill et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
The Superior Court opinion, 139 A.3d 208 (Pa. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
The Superior Court opinion, 139 A.3d 208 (Pa. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:40 am
Bratton v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
Mandell-Brown, 2010-Ohio-3832 (1st Dist.) [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm
To quote, Brown J. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:05 am
Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Likely in response to the California Supreme Court’s December 23, 2016 ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
The Plaintiff's claims were based on nuisance and negligence.Justice Heeney of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff's claim on the basis that the application of biosolids did not cause the Plaintiff's well to become contaminated. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
And while no court has explicitly held that an irrigation district is a municipal corporation under Labor Code 220(b), in Johnson v. [read post]
