Search for: "Bryant, Appeal of" Results 321 - 340 of 678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 6:29 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Tuesday, August 21, 2012: $60,000 Verdict for Blogging the Truth About A Person Intending to Get Him Fired — Reversed Lawyers Who Bleat Secrets to the Press – (Eric Turkewitz) Law Applications Drop While Tuition Rises Appeal court grants leave to appeal in OLG class action | Canadian Lawyer Magazine Canada turns a blind eye to Khadr  Khadr’s lawyers no strangers to int’l cases |… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 2:47 am
Bryant Indicted For Fraud and Corruption  " A federal grand jury on Thursday indicted New Jersey State Sen. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:58 pm
This attempt was recently rejected by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bryant v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:11 am by tracey
Supreme Court Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22 (30 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Q- Park Ltd. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
However, I hope that my talk will give a sense that the child-protective argument deserves to be unpacked—all the more so because it appeals to an unassailable value. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:03 am by John J. Cord
Sprint Fidelis Leads: Last week, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in Case no. 9-2290, Anna Bryant v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:14 pm
Smith was Shelley Bryant (a Davis graduate).Interesting case. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 10:30 am by Greensboro Law Blog
Newby and Judge Sam Ervin, IV2012 North Carolina Court of Appeals RacesJudge Cressie Thigpen and Chris DillonJudge Wanda Bryant and Judge Marty McGeeJudge Linda McGee and David S. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:03 am
In statementsto police after his arrest, Stanley Bryant, who pleaded guilty to the rape,implicated two others in the crime: a James Giles and a Michael Brown.DNA evidence later linked Brown and Bryant to the crime, Smith and Potkinsaid. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:42 am by pfriedman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explained in the 2010 decision overturning an earlier jury verdict in favor of Mattel, that idea in and of itself could not be claimed by Mattel merely because Bryant was its employee at the time: Assuming that Mattel owns Bryant’s preliminary drawings and sculpt, its copyrights in the works would cover only its particular expression of the bratty-doll idea, not the idea itself. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm by Jamison Koehler
Court of Appeals decided to essentially ignore the U.S. [read post]