Search for: "Bull v. Bull"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2016, 9:00 am
In this Indiana lawsuit, a trademark lawyer for NIBCO lists the following claims: • Count I: Federal Trademark Infringement• Count II: Federal Unfair Competition/False Designation of Origin• Count III: Common Law Trademark Infringement• Count IV: Common Law Unfair Competition • Count V: Federal Trademark Dilution NIBCO asks the court for equitable relief; damages, including punitive damages; costs and attorney fees. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Bras for the Cause Iowa, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Follow me on Twitter: @devlinhartline • • • “To Do” vs. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:49 am
• Los Angeles County, Calif. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:19 am
However, as in the case of Bull v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:15 pm
Law Week - Supreme Court Today: • Judulang v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 5:58 am
In Rubenstein v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 12:22 pm
Tracy carved out a pit bull exception. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Recently, the Supreme Court denied cert. inSigramSchindlerBeteiligunsgesellschaft v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:51 pm
George Vo-Duc Deputy District Attorney, Salt Lake County • The Basics of Plea Negotiations • Duties of the Prosecutor • Special Duties of the Prosecutor • Ethical Considerations • Victim Involvement or Impact Clayton Simms Criminal Defense Attorney • Duties of the Defense Counsel • Plea Negotiation Approaches • Ethical Considerations • Strategic Decisions in Plea Negotiations… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:12 pm
• Crime narratives and the media discourse on organized trans-European crime. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:12 pm
• Crime narratives and the media discourse on organized trans-European crime. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:39 pm
In a 48-page complaint, filed by trademark lawyers for Plaintiff, those claims and others are made: • Count I: Federal Trademark Infringement• Count II: Federal Unfair Competition• Count III: Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act• Count IV: Breach of Fiduciary Duty• Count V: Breach of Tiffany's Agreement• Count VI: Tortious Interference with Contract• Count VII: Tortious Interference… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
They say -- okay, even I say -- that the en banc draw doesn't always matter. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:14 pm
The Court reviewed each of the factors enunciated in Poulis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:29 am
After the application was published for opposition on 8 March 2012 (there's a window of two months for opposition purposes), V&S Vin & Sprit Aktiebolag, the Swedish producer of ABSOLUT vodka, opposed the application. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
In Okemgbo v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 9:25 am
Look for more information about this and other events via our social media outlets: • In Custodia Legis• Twitter• Facebook [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
Section 605• Count II: Violation of Title 47 U.S.C. [read post]
