Search for: "Burns v. U.s.*" Results 321 - 340 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Below is the complete text of the Florida Senate Bill of the proposed Medical Marijuana Statute in Florida. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:43 am by opseo
§ 3156) in United States of American v. [read post]
Second, a few key themes repeated throughout the complaint provide insight into what the SEC sees as relevant under the Howey factors: The SEC consistently homes in on the fact that, for each token, the founders or development team held a large tranche of tokens — apparently suggesting that their economic incentives were aligned with purchasers’ — which may be relevant to the “common enterprise” and/or “expectation of profits” prongs of Howey;… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
In humans, chlorine can corrode the respiratory tract and cause severe eye and skin burns, lung collapse and death. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
These products heat the tobacco rather than burn and as such do not create any smoke. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]