Search for: "Butler v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  On the 2012 Roundtable, see, Paper Delivered at the 2012 Penn State Law and Semiotics Roundtable: The Corporation as Semiosis, “Citizens United,” the Signification of the Corporate Enterprise and the Development of Law Law at the End of the Day, March 3, 2012; on the 2011 Roundtable see Larry Catá Backer, The 2011 Kevelson Workshop on Law and Semiotics at Penn State--Outstanding Student Presentations,  Law at the End of the Day, April 11,… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 10:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, a case I have discussed on this blog many times. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by rstokes
Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
The butler received them and ushered them into the living room. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
 The brief supports certiorari — but only for one of the two questions presented: namely, whether a supplier can be held liable for providing ‘all or a substantial portion of the components of a patented invention’ from the United States when the supplier ships for combination abroad only a single commodity component of a multi-component invention The patent in the case involves a DNA amplification kit used for personal identification. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:24 am by Eugene Volokh
{While not controlling, the Court notes that this conclusion is consistent with the Butler County Common Pleas' recent decision in Smith v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
WEINSTEIN, PINSON & RILEY, P.S., EVAN MOSCOV, and EGS FINANCIAL CARE, INC., formerly known as NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.No. 14 C 739.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
In its January 10, 2012 opinion in CompuCredit v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]