Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
Hewlett-Packard Company, C. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
§§ 1066a(g), 1066b(g). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:36 am
Günzel, C. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
A process for removing nitrogen oxides from flue gas issuing from a regenerator of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit wherein the flue gas is cleaned of substantial amounts of dust in the regenerator, the process comprising the steps of:a) directing the flue gas into a tertiary cyclone separator and separating the solids therefrom so that not more than 250mg/Nm3 of solids exit in an overflow from the tertiary cyclone separator and causing between 0.5% and 6% percentage of flue gas entering the… [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:20 am
These 5 cases were: 27/02/20, C-240/18 P – FACK JU GÖTHE; 04/03/20, C-155-158/18 P, Burlington; 04/03/20, C-328/18 P – Equivalenza Manufactory [BLACK LABEL]; 11/06/20, C-115/19 P, China Construction Bank [CB vs. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:25 am
When Indictment Triggers Juvenile Transfer The new G.S. 7B-2200.5(a)(1) provides that all Class A – Class G felonies alleged to have been committed by a juvenile at age 16 or 17 must be transferred to superior court for trial as an adult after “[n]otice to the juvenile and a finding by the court that a bill of indictment has been returned against the juvenile charging the commission of an offense that constitutes a Class A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F, or G felony if… [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 3:05 am
As I discussed here, following this approach would have been both an odd departure from earlier CJEU case law and truly undesirable.Secondly, in line with Cofemel and - in the trade mark field - the recent Gömböc judgment [see here and here] - the decision adopts an 'open-minded' approach to IPR cumulation. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:17 am
Gisuseppe Ciardi Foundation will has issued a call for nominations for its 2012 prize for a substantial and original study dealing with military law, law of war or any matter connected with or related to the aforementioned. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Kenneth D., 213 A.D.2d 714, 624 N.Y.S.2d 455; Matter of Victor James L., 208 A.D.2d 403, 618 N.Y.S.2d 213; Matter of Travis Lee G., 169 A.D.2d 769, 565 N.Y.S.2d 136). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
[CRC 3.922(d)(2) (pdf)] G. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
The matters subject to mandatory transfer include Class A felonies alleged to have been committed at ages 13, 14, or 15 and Class A – G felonies alleged to have been committed at ages 16 or 17. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
[The patent proprietor’s] main argument hinges on an earlier transfer of [opponent 2’s] business assets related to the subject-matter of the opposed patent from Pelikan Hardcopy (International) AG to Pelikan Holding AG on 1 July 2007. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:00 am
Winslow of Family Matters? [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:52 am
—Chief Justice Tani G. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Today, Columbia is honoring Jack Coffee, a leader of securities law scholarship and policy. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 9:07 am
G. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* The CJEU Hyperlinks Trilogy: Part III, C-279/13 C More EntertainmentTom pens a summary of the Court of Justice of the European Union's decisions on linking and copyright. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
G 6/88 [2.5]). [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
According to the National Taxpayer Advocate, in a blistering criticism of Form 1023-EZ, 37 percent of a representative sample of Form 1023-EZ applicants whose applications were approved by the IRS were not, as a matter of law, 501(c)(3) organizations (i.e., they didn’t qualify and could run into major problems if they ever get audited). [read post]
