Search for: "C. P.1" Results 321 - 340 of 11,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
This judgment addressed the question whether artificial neural networks (ANNs) are excluded subject matter under the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion of section 1(2)(c) of the UK Patents Act 1977. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:23 am by gA
Muchos años después, luego de jurar en la Corte, afirmará que lo hizo porque "no le cerraban los precios" de una licitación de cárceles que había promovido el Ministerio de Obras Públicas. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:15 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The two EUTMs have already been subject of an invalidity application from Best Lock Ltd. back in 2012, based on the same two grounds [T-395/14, confirmed by the Court of Justice in C-451/15 P and commented by The IPKat here].In its 2022 ruling, the BoA reminded that the EUIPO had indeed already rendered a decision relating to the same subject and the same cause. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sorel-Tracy (Ville de) c. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 7:18 am by gA
Comienza a crearse una opinión pública que hace eje en la inseguridad y pone en cuestión la solvencia y diligencia del poder judicial. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Pirani,[1] many have predicted that Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 will decline into a state of near irrelevance. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Sara Notario
On 23 November 2023, Advocate General (‘AG’) Ćapeta published her Opinion in Joined Cases C-29/22 P and C-44/22 concerning a human rights action for damages brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) by direct family members of persons who got killed or kidnapped – KS and KD – against the Council, the European Commission and the European External Action Service (‘EEAS’). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am by Marcel Pemsel
The need to keep a certain sign free for competitors is not an interest protected under Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR, but rather of other absolute grounds, such as Artt. 7(1)(c), (d) or (e) EUTMR. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 8:42 pm by gA
Muy por el contrario, creo junto a la sociedad toda, que usted debe dar un paso al costado para preservar la imagen del Poder Judicial, que sus apariciones públicas han deteriorado en forma pronunciada.Los procesos en contra de Nazareno avanzan rápido en la Cámara de Diputados. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm by Giles Peaker
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Laplante c. [read post]
Par ailleurs, bien que l’interprétation d’une clause de sous-traitance demeure un exercice au cas par cas, il est intéressant de retenir de ce précédent que l’examen de la présence ou non du « personnel qualifié » pour des travaux donnés ne peut faire fi de la période à laquelle ceux-ci doivent être réalisés selon l’employeur. [read post]