Search for: "C. S. vs M. R." Results 321 - 340 of 451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2011, 2:07 pm
Section 101.93(f) simply restates part of the definition of the types of claims that may be made under section 403(r)(6) of the FD&C Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:55 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: "Larry Summers vs. the Tiger Mom: Why A students become academics and C students become billionaire donors" http://on.wsj.com/eB0Xz3 from the chronicle of higher education ... [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Kevin
It's Dennis Kucinich vs. the Longworth House Office Building cafeteria, in a battle to determine who should pay for injuries allegedly suffered when Rep. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Target (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) Claim amendments in reexamination eliminate patentee’s right to past damages: District Court C D California – Antonious v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 10:39 am by The Legal Blog
Justice SathasivamThe Supreme Court, in M/S J.P.Builders & Anr. vs A.Ramadas Rao & Anr., has examined one of the most crucial aspects involved in a suit for specific performance. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Chattem Inc., et. al., (Docket Report) M D Florida: Difficulty determining expiration of patent requires false marking complaint to plead knowledge of expiration with specificity: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 6:45 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
We would anticipate that in the near term (particularly in light of the Government’s proposal to review the entire Act) the review threshold will be increased in the normal course by annual cost of living indexing to approximately C$310 million. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
In this editorial, published in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infectious Diseases journal (January 2011), the journal's associate editor Dr. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm by Narine Bagdassarian
  Also important is Section 512(c)(c), referred to as the “safe harbor” provision. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, consider the item that prompted the comment to which I’m responding — pleaded vs. pled. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:10 pm by Robert Guest
It's as if Benjamin Franklin's liberty vs safety quote has come to life. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:15 am by Julio César Córdoba
Comentario a CNCom., sala C, 13/04/10, Schuster, Matías Nicolás c. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
ITC (Patently-O) District Court Utah: Failure to mark not attributed to licensor where licensee’s rights arise from ‘License that contains an apparently unlimited covenant not to sue’: Phillip M. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:12 pm by Adam Thierer
It’s that (a) I‘m more willing to allow evolutionary dynamism to run its course within digital markets, even if that means some “closed” devices and platforms remain (or even thrive); and, (b) the “openness” they advocate inevitably devolves into expanded government control of cyberspace. [read post]