Search for: "C.J." Results 321 - 340 of 1,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Time for reform [Jonathan Blanks, Cato] “NYC has shelled out $384M in 5 years to settle NYPD suits” [Yoav Gonen, Julia Marsh and Bruce Golding, New York Post] “Federal Judge Breaks Up Albuquerque’s Car Theft Ring” [Jacob Sullum, Reason on forfeiture ruling; Tim Cushing, TechDirt; Ilya Somin on legal implications] Class-action suit challenges civil forfeitures [George Hunter, Detroit News; C.J. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Wolfgang Demino
., Appellant.Appeal from County Court AT Law NO. 3 of Tarrant County Trial Court NO. 2016-005652-3.PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; MEIER and KERR, JJ.MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]BONNIE SUDDERTH, Chief Justice.Appellant Bank of America, N.A. sued Appellee Cristella Lerma a/k/a Cristella D. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:24 pm by Barry Sookman
In an 8-1 decision written by Brown J, (with whom Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Gascon, Rowe and Martin JJ agreed) the Court held that ISPs must bear the costs of complying with their obligations under s41.26(2) of the notice and notice regime. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:49 am by Steve Kalar
Aug. 29, 2018), decision available here.British alpine skier Alain Baxter, disqualified because of a (legal) isomer of methPlayers: Decision by Judge Fisher, joined by C.J. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
That said, of the majority, overall I found McLachlin C.J. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:46 pm
Here's the abstract:Writing for his fellow military officers in early 1903, United States Army Major C.J. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am by David Kopel
State may regulate, but not nullify, the right to bear arms.Today a 2-1 Ninth Circuit panel held that Hawaii's near-total prohibition on the carrying of handguns for lawful self-defense violates the Second Amendment right to bear arms. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
Ian’s opening is similarly unflattering toward C.J. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:27 pm by The Blog Team
The panel (Garland, C.J., Edwards and Silberman JJ), found that distinction intellectually troubling but concluded that the error – if any – of admitting this evidence was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of Winstead’s guilt. [read post]