Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. NEVADA." Results 321 - 340 of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Intervenor-Appellees in the case are the seven Colorado River Basin States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming; the Colorado River Commission of Nevada; the Southern Nevada Water Authority; the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association; the Central Arizona Water Conservation District; the Imperial Irrigation District; and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (collectively, … [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:23 am
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a 4-part decision rejecting legal challenges to the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan by environmentals. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:50 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 27928 (ED CA, Feb. 20, 2019), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's complaint that his Sikh head covering was confiscated on two occasions.In Dewitt v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 36133 (D NV, March 21, 2016), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2016 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 46697 (ED CA, April 5, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that his religious rights were being infringed by the denial of a vegetarian diet.In Huddleston v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:38 am
  But then, in turning to the balancing test required by Valley Bank of Nevada v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
California resource guide for cerebral palsy and individuals with special needs. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:24 am by Jamie Williams
But some companies, like Oracle, turned to state computer crime statutes—in this case, California and Nevada—to enforce their computer use preferences. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 41907 (ED CA, March 14, 2019), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that on one occasion he was denied access to a Jehovah's Witness religious service.In Abreu v. [read post]