Search for: "CALIFORNIANS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 321 - 340
of 591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Do we have a sense of what Californians currently think about online privacy issues? [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:26 pm
Penner v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:48 am
The People Round 4: Sedgwick v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Following the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
California (12-9490). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm
The panel remanded the case for the district court to determine whether the ethanol provisions discriminate in purpose or effect and, if not, to apply the balancing test established in Pike v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:43 pm
The case is entitled, Purton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:37 am
SB 292 was recently passed by the California Legislature to overrule Kelley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:42 am
The legislation (SB 292) was introduced for the express purpose of overturning a California Appeals court decision, Kelley v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part Two of the series, scheduled to run August 2, 2013, I will sketch out what I think Californians should do to properly and finally lay Proposition 8 fully to rest. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm
Abbott Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
These risks are highlighted by the California Supreme Court decision in Save Tara v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:31 pm
Despite this rule of law, in 1988, the California Court of Appeal decided the case of Hanif v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
California, in which the California Supreme Court voided a law, authorized by the constitution, allowing racial discrimination in land ownership, and Reitman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am
California, in which the California Supreme Court voided a law, authorized by the constitution, allowing racial discrimination in land ownership, and Reitman v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:18 pm
By Hilary Lamar The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
