Search for: "CARR v. STATE" Results 321 - 340 of 837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
Bashe Abdi Yousuf (08-1555) - Petitioner's brief Thursday, Dec. 3: Carr v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Carr (C.A. 3, 1994), 25 F.3d 1194; United States v. $639,558.00 in United States Currency (C.A. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Subjects covered in the seminar include the Legal Requirements of Auctions in Ohio, The Most Famous Auctioneer Real Estate Case in Ohio, Disclosure v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:34 pm by Amy Howe
” Unlike last Term’s oral argument and opinion announcement in Glossip v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
  On July 27, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court issued its decision in Innkeeper Ministries, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
  (The Court acknowledged a split of authority on that question in footnote 2 of its opinion last Term in Carr v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:47 am by Brian Cordery
In doing so, the Judge relied on several authorities including the judgment of Popplewell J in Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) v Government of Lao [2013]. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Carr (the apportionment case one man [woman]/one vote), West Coast Hotel (states can regulate business), Miranda v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
  Carr J , whilst noting that it was no reflection on the solicitor who had originally given the statement, stated that he did not believe AbbVie's explanation for its decision to abandon the '656 patent because it was not credible given the context. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
At the Michigan View, Jeffrey Hadden previews next week’s oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
 However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]