Search for: "CHANNEL v. STATE" Results 321 - 340 of 3,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
From the WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center Administrative Panel Decision in Polanski v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:09 am by Eric Goldman
Konrath State Legislator Doesn’t Understand That He Works for the Government–Attwood v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:56 pm by Tom Smith
But over time, they argued, the battlefield has changed and they believed the threat that President Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:52 pm by Chris Dreyer
That all changed in 1977 when one Phoenix law firm ran an ad in a local newspaper that became the basis for the landmark decision in Bates v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
The threats are everywhere: Congress, state legislatures, the Supreme Court, internationally. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am by Cyberleagle
The Secretary of State’s proposal has reportedly sparked fears among humanitarian organisations of consequences if they share footage that may call into question the policing of Channel crossings. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The parties debated them forcefully on the House and Senate floor, in state houses, and in campaigns up and down the ballot. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am by Dan Lopez
We’re going to cross the pond and we’re going to get a report on some interesting issues and recent cases that have been adjudicated over in the United Kingdom and a view from our friends in the UK regarding the state of competition law on some important topics that my partner, Stephen Critchley, will introduce. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
The Supreme Court seemed to go out of its way in American Insurance Association v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]