Search for: "COCHRAN v STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
This post focuses on the limitations that the ADA imposes on such testing, and concludes that the Seventh Circuit’s approach to the issue in Karraker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
Cochrane v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 11:45 pm
In Flores v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 11:11 pm
Yesterday's Houston Chronicle carries a story about a November decision by the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in Oliver v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
See, e.g., Cochran v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Box 1698 Jackson, MS 39215 Phone: (601) 987-4872 (V/TTY); (800) 852-8328 (V/TTY/Toll Free in MS) Web: http://www.msprojectstart.org T.K. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:31 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:41 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (6): Benjamin Wade Cochran v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:03 am
A correspondent sent me the pdf of August 16 decision in Northrop Grumman v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Baker v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:20 am
" Cochran argued the case of Rita v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 pm
Saxbe Designated Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University Tom Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Middle District of North Carolina (Attorney for [sic] Vincent Rita, Rita v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
Congress could have expressly limited the Rule's application to specific acts, but it did not do so.On part two Judge Baker found error, but ultimately held no prejudice under the constitutional standard (harmless beyond a reasonable doubt), citing United States v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:40 am
Mar v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:06 am
John Sullivan and Quentin Pittman won an acquittal in State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
