Search for: "CONDO v. STATE" Results 321 - 340 of 580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2015, 1:53 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The defendants later filed a second motion to dismiss, alleging that the remaining two claims were time-barred, and the fourth claim, for breach of the Municipal Code, failed to state a claim. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:29 am
In some ways, the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Alberta v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am by John Day
Stated differently, the consumer has only suffered an economic loss. [read post]
5 Jun 2021, 12:38 pm by Georgialee Lang
  But the Ontario Court of Appeal in Climins v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 Lamb of Valorem Law Group at his blog, In Search of Perfect Client Service Impeachment of Board Members - Toronto attorney Denise Lash of Hennan Blaikie on the firm's blog, Condo Reporter The White House Releases Smart Grid Report - Philadelphia attorney Linda Evers of Stevens & Lee on the firm's blog, Smart Grid Legal News Junk Fax NAL Includes $150,000 Penalty for Multiple Offenses - Washington, DC lawyer Steve Augustino of… [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Court of Appeals's decision, please use this link: Gletzer v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Ryan Blay
  So very often you see a case caption that reads: Huge National Bank v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:58 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In Philip Abi-Najm, et. al, v Concord Condominium, LLC, several condominium purchasers sued Concord under for breach of contract, breach of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) and for fraud in the inducement based upon flooring that Concord installed that was far from the quality stated in the purchase contract. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:05 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In Philip Abi-Najm, et. al, v Concord Condominium, LLC, several condominium purchasers sued Concord under for breach of contract, breach of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) and for fraud in the inducement based upon flooring that Concord installed that was far from the quality stated in the purchase contract. [read post]