Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 321 - 340 of 15,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 pm by HeratyLaw
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ———————————–x BELLMER DOLLS, a Partnership, PETER MAVROGEORGIS, ANTHONY MALAT, and PETER SHEERIN, Plaintiffs, - v - : ASIM SHAIKH aka ASIM GRABOWSKI-SHAIKH, HUNGRY EYE RECORDS LLC, PUBCO, DANIEL SKIBRA, and : JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:35 am
Last week, I blogged about the Supreme Court's opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:38 am by Sophia Tang
In particular, the Huawei v Conversant judgment has high similarity with Huawei v Samsung judgment rendered by the California Northern District Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:30 am by Unknown
R(AAA) v SSHD (RLI Blog, July 2023) [text]Minority ethnic politicians are pushing harsh immigration policies – why representation doesn’t always mean racial justice (The Conversation, July 2023) [text]‘Performative cruelty’: the hostile architecture of the UK government’s migrant barge (The Conversation, July 2023) [text]Rwanda plan is in legal limbo, but history shows such migration deals are unlikely to disappear (The Conversation,… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:29 am by nflatow
  In November, the Supreme Court will hear United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Recorded telephone conversations Henry Jefferson Gray, appellant, was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County of three counts of conspiracy: conspiracy to distribute cocaine, conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess cocaine. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:26 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Recorded telephone conversation A jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, convicted Dyron Jackson, appellant, of first-degree assault, use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun, and possession of a regulated firearm by a ... [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:03 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In People v Badalamenti, 2016 WL 1306683 (2016) the Court of Appeals held that the definition of consent, in the context of “mechanical overhearing of a conversation” pursuant to Penal Law § 250.00(2), includes vicarious consent, on behalf of a minor child. [read post]