Search for: "COOPER v. HOLDER"
Results 321 - 340
of 561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm
A justification that the discussion paper gives for this proposal is that Australia's obligations under its Free Trade Agreements with the United States, Singapore and South Korea require it to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am
He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
In the case of “Aunt Sally v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In Bell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
On Friday, June 13, 2014 SCC delivered the R. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
The authors argue that copyright law has failed to support the creative industries in a digital world where it is socially acceptable to use and re-use content freely, instead favouring the rights holders and intermediaries. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
The recent jury verdict in the Zwerner case in Miami, Florida (U.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
See Holder v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:59 am
However, in Canada there are significant obstacles in governmental liability for what could be construed as regulatory failures, under the Cooper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:27 pm
Walker, Jr. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Little Rock case, Cooper v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Until 2009, each unit-holder nominated one director to the four-member board. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
Gilman asserted that in doing so, `neither [he] nor any other privilege holder waives any applicable privilege(s). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Existing law requires a cooperative corporation to include in its name the word “cooperative. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:20 am
Cir. 2005) and Cooper Techs. [read post]
