Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am
On appeal, the Second Circuit vacates the account transfers to JLM. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 8:48 am
Late last week, the California Court of Appeal issued an unpublished decision in Compton Unified School District v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
The employer has vowed to appeal the decision. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:29 am
Addressing cross appeals the trial court declined to consider, the court held the EIR did not adequately consider a reasonable range of project alternatives. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
These findings of fact paved the way for the California Supreme Court’s decision above, following a short-lived reversal by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
LEXIS 110284 (ED CA, Aug. 18, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that his free exercise rights were infringed when he was denied access to his religious beads and cross while temporarily in administrative segregation.In White v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
Cross, 2015 U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
LEXIS 4974 (CT Super., Nov. 28, 2017), a Connecticut trial court dismissed an inmate's complaints that his religious oils and his gold chain and cross were placed in temporary storage; however the court allowed him to move ahead on his claim that his oils were wrongly classified as contraband.In Kollock v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:26 am
MySpace and Cross v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
Abbott Town of Atherton v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
Rabbi Tendler sought review with the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
He is currently researching cross-border media law issues. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
That is the path taken by Justices Scalia and Thomas in today's memorial cross case, Salazar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:14 am
Supreme Court on its opening day of the term includes the denial of review in two cases of interest:Church of Scientology v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Indeed, the Third District Court of Appeal in Pulido v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
This post examines a decision from the California Court of Appeals – Second District: People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:34 pm
In the Northern District of California Federal Court, the case of Perry, et al., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:40 pm
The California District Court of Appeal recently issued its decision in Jong v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
March 3 - 7, 2007: U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, March 04, 2008 Mora v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:02 pm
That meager harvest, which has failed to give Samsung strategic leverage over Apple, yet compares rather favorably to its assertions of non-SEPs: a federal jury in the Northern District of California identified no infringements at last year's trial (Samsung had previously withdrawn several non-SEPs), the Mannheim Regional Court had stayed two patents over non-SEPs of dubious validity (a smiley input patent and a voiceover patent), a Tokyo court ruled against Samsung's… [read post]
