Search for: "California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court" Results 321 - 340 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2020, 7:19 am by Eric Goldman
” The court rejected the patient’s anti-SLAPP motion because the remarks were provably false, not just opinions. * Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
At the request of the Ninth Circuit, the court addressed the following question: "Whether, as a matter of California law, a California county and its employees can form an implied contract that confers vested rights to health benefits on retired county employees. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm by Jon Gelman
” The data from California used by Boden, Reville, and Biddle involved workers injured in 1994 and subsequent changes in the PPD benefits in California have probably made the benefits even less adequate. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
Blancarte is preparing his appeal to the Superior Court and we will hear more on the plight of the California entertainment lawyer as unlicensed talent agent. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
An Ohio appellate court found that a similar statute in that state allowed only people -- not organizations or other entities -- to receive money from such accounts. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),Michael Geist: presentation on open access, focusing on why adopting open access models can help counter restrictive contractual terms and copyright laws: (Michael Geist),Audacity – Sometimes sheer audacity can overcome superior forces, or a well-entrenched position: (IP ThinkTank),Presentation on IPR and professional opportunities for advocates and chartered accountants: (Generic Pharmaceuticals &… [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
”14 In 1942, the Supreme Court of Iowa explained: [P]roperty . . . is applied with many different meanings. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd represented the class as lead plaintiff and lead counsel, respectively. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
      MOOTNESS FEES The Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 decision in In re Trulia, Inc. [read post]