Search for: "California Board of Equalization" Results 321 - 340 of 2,386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 3:16 am by Liz Dunshee
Dave blogged last week that a California court struck down the state’s board gender diversity statute, finding that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
24 May 2022, 1:12 am by Josh Richman
You and I go way back and I currently serve on the board of advisors of Verified Voting. [read post]
May 13, 2022), the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles (Duffy-Lewis, J.) issued a decision following a bench trial finding that Senate Bill 826 (“SB 826”), California’s law requiring gender diversity on boards of directors, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
Finally, in 2017, after a number of further hearings, the County’s Board of Supervisors, which was acting under the legal constraints of the federal judgments and continuing district court supervision, voted 3-2 to certify the EIR, and conditionally approve the project with a statement of overriding considerations addressing significant and unavoidable impacts. [read post]
20 May 2022, 5:58 am by Nicholas Espíritu
Board of Education, held that the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits racial segregation in public schools. [read post]
20 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But replacement theory, once confined to Reddit message boards and semi-obscure white nationalist sites, has gone mainstream. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sam Wong
A California state judge ruled that California’s board gender diversity law—which required state-headquartered companies to place women on their boards of directors—violated the equal protection clause of the state constitution. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Virginia Milstead
Padilla, Case No. 19STCV27561, that California’s statute requiring California-based public companies to have one to three women on their boards of directors (S.B. 826), depending on their board size, violated the equal protection clause of the state constitution. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm by Ian Michalak
  It required public companies headquartered in California to have at least one female on the board of directors by the end of 2019. [read post]
18 May 2022, 11:04 am by Mike McCluskey
Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming the law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution, which says “[a] person may not be…denied equal protection of the laws. [read post]
Plaintiffs alleged that SB 826 violated Equal Protection under both Article I, Section 7 and Article I, Section 31 of the California Constitution. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:15 am by David Lynn
Last week, Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, found that SB 826, the California law requiring that California-headquartered companies have a minimum number of women directors, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
17 May 2022, 1:17 am by Joshua Richman
She also co-founded and co-organized the related MD4SG (Mechanism Design for Social Good) research initiative as well as the non-profit organization Black in AI, where she sits on the Board of Directors and co-leads the Academic Program. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:15 am
As I noted yesterday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis has found California's female director quota law, SB 826, to violate the Equal Protection clause of the California Constitution (A person may not be . . . denied equal protection of the law"). [read post]
  The court also distinguished the holding of another California federal court that reached the opposition conclusion. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:03 pm by Francis Pileggi
 This principle applies equally to outside directors as decisionmakers, given the controlling stockholder’s ability to elect directors. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
” In its April 1, 2022, decision, the court concluded that the law, known as Assembly Bill 979 and codified at California Corporations Code §301.4, violated the equal protection clause in California’s constitution. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
” In its April 1, 2022, decision, the court concluded that the law, known as Assembly Bill 979 and codified at California Corporations Code §301.4, violated the equal protection clause in California’s constitution. [read post]