Search for: "California v. Harris"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2018, 7:46 pm
Harris v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:02 am
Harris v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:01 am
The Court of Appeal in Harris v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:02 pm
Apple v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:18 pm
The Court pointed out that other factors to be considered are whether: (1) the employee exercises discretion and independent judgment; (2) the employee directly assists an employee in an executive or administrative capacity; and (3) the employee performs specialized or technical work under only general supervision.Practical Tip: The Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm
Harry Reid (D-Nev.) [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
Eastman—a law professor from Chapman University and senior fellow at the Claremont Institute—raised a question about the citizenship status of Harris’s parents at the time of her birth in California in 1964. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Weil V. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
Harris v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
From the 2018 California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 12:44 pm
" Harris v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:24 am
In Harris v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:23 pm
By Larry Golub and Sam Sorich On July 23, 2012, we reported that the California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District) held in Harris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:31 am
The court referred to the decision in Harris v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
This morning the Court will hear oral arguments in Harris v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
The court pointed out that the Dixon bar was inconsistently applied until September 30, 1993, when the California Supreme Court decided Harris. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Harry “Bing” Crosby, Jr., began singing professionally in the 1920s. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:20 am
In Harris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
” [via Lexisone] Lamar Cornelius Harris v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]