Search for: "California v. Johnson"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2017, 4:02 pm
LEXIS 173946 (D KA, Oct. 20, 2017), a Kansas federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead against one defendant on his claim that his Ramadan meals were not served early enough.In Johnson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
LEXIS 22708 (ED CA, Feb. 24, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a suit by a Hindu civil detainee that he was denied his religious vegan diet.In Perez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Kevin Johnson and others weigh in on Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 8:00 am
LEXIS 47715, May 14, 2010) questioned the finding of no irreparable harm and ordered defendants to respond before deciding the issue.In Johnson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm
Johnson, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
The California Supreme Court expanded upon Broughton in Cruz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:10 am
On Sunday, the Chicago Tribune reported on the latest round of the Sugar v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm
California law is quite good, going back even before Motus v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
California) that an individual in Johnson’s situation certainly would not have felt he could walk away from the scene. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 4:33 pm
Strong v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Riverside Order; and 2/15/05 Johnson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:17 am
The court cited an 1889 ruling, Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. (1991) 500 U.S. 20; Zavala v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 12:48 pm
The August 10, 2018, verdict in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
And while no court has explicitly held that an irrigation district is a municipal corporation under Labor Code 220(b), in Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
Under US v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 12:40 pm
See Nick King Jr. et al. v. [read post]
