Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 321 - 340
of 34,068
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As SCOTUS explained in Sec'y of State of Md. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Also, see Contract Services Employee Trust v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:13 am
This fact pattern played out recently in Epochal Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
California’s 60-Day “For Further Study Rule. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal distinguished the California Supreme Court's holding in Schachter v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Sutton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Even though business laws, including corporate and securities laws, have been heavily influenced in the last several decades by what can fairly be called an ideology of profit maximization, much of the law has in practice withstood efforts to reduce business law’s prescriptions to this single objective.[2] In the American Law Institute’s Principles of Corporate Governance, for example, the objective of business corporations to act “with… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
There have been no media law hearings for the past fortnight. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 11:54 pm
The Bottom Line While the Ninth Circuit has touted the value of expert witnesses in several of its recent (albeit unpublished) opinions, Yonay v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:10 pm
The post Obesity May Qualify As a Disability Under California Law appeared first on C [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
[FN2] See, e.g., Ferens v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Corbett v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 10:13 am
The court explains: California law does not categorically state that a contract can never be formed on the basis of browsewrap. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:57 am
City of Costa Mesa, California v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:01 am
X Corp v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Clark v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
Vichy Springs Resort, Inc. v. [read post]