Search for: "California v. Miranda" Results 321 - 340 of 378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
Rigterink Issue: Must a suspect be expressly advised to his right to counsel during questioning and if so, does the failure to provide this express advice vitiate Miranda v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
LaCroix of The D&O Diary Miranda Warnings for Lawyers? [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
In a Kern County, California strip search case, the court finds that group strip searches were unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and remanded to the district court to amend its written judgment were the judgment failed to include any reasons for the court’s upward departure from the guidelines range, agreeing with the Second Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:09 am
In 1983, a California case (People v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
(SCOTUS did the same power move in Miranda and Strickland and hell, even Marbury v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 11, 2008 Dutil v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
[Cross-reference to Lemley and Pooley, California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards discussing Edwards v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Mitchell, No. 03-4293 In a death penalty case, denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where the district court correctly rejected claims that: 1) petitioner's Miranda rights had been violated by police actions in this case, which included four instances of questioning, each following a Miranda warning, over a six-hour period; 2) penalty phase jury instructions were constitutionally deficient; and 3) prosecutorial misconduct denied him due process. . [read post]