Search for: "Cheek v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
Up the creek, but not probably not Chinese Cheek – counterfeit wine (IPKat) EWPCC: Walking fingers in Azerbaijan irrelevant to British action, rules judge: Yell Ltd v Louis Giboin and others (IPKat) PCC Page 24 – One strike (with a tentacle) – but are you out? [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
Furthermore, as discussed in Part IV, at least two state courts differ in their treatment of this issue, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals’ invalidation of a statute analogous to North Carolina’s is instructive on the Fourth Amendment unreasonableness of cheek swabs under such statutes. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by SHG
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:19 am by SHG
As a rosy-cheeked college frosh, I studied labor history with Professor Roger Keeren. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:57 am by NL
As far as I can gather, this means that she writes about her opinions on the family and the state for a tory think tank. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf In a very interesting opinion last week in Byrd v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:01 pm by lawmrh
Fortunately, the court’s opinion, which can be read in its entirety at No. 10–0520  IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
Baldwin, I did so with tongue-in-cheek, and you can find that response here, and again at the end of this document: Bad Biz Finder’s Erin Baldwin is Awe Inspiring. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]