Search for: "Childs F. Burden" Results 321 - 340 of 1,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 7:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Section 1012(f)(i)(B) of the Family Court Act defines a "neglected child" as a child less than 18 years of age "whose physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired" because of a parent's failure to exercise a minimum degree of care "by misusing a drug or drugs. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:57 am by Charles Gallmeyer
Act 619 would prevent mothers from having an abortion because their unborn child may have Down syndrome. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
If a petitioner shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the removal or the retention of the child was wrongful, the burden shifts to the respondent to prove an applicable affirmative defense. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Domestic Relations Law § 240(1–b)(f)(10) and FCA § 413(1)(f)(10) state that, after performing the requisite calculations, “the court shall order the non-custodial parent to pay his or her pro rata share of the basic child support obligation. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
They acknowledge that the minor is a child, but for purposes of deciding whether to carry a pregnancy to term, that minor would be bearing a burden that only adults should be bearing. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
“[F]ailure by a parent to communicate with his or her child is sufficient to authorize adoption without that parent’s consent only if there is a complete absence of communication for the statutorily defined one-year period. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
F engaged in the necessary work, but M declined to. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:55 am by JP Sarmiento
Public Law 111-83 (2009) eased this burden for beneficiaries whose petitioners died prior to their adjustment of status application. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
On one occasion, Petitioner struck one of the Children in the back of the head, which caused the child to strike her front tooth, breaking it. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The court determined that the husband’s various submissions denying a sexual relationship with R.L. were “conclusory and self-serving,” and, failed to meet his prima facie burden on summary judgment. [read post]