Search for: "Christian v. Smith" Results 321 - 340 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:12 am by jonathanturley
Elenis when it ruled that Lorie Smith, a Christian website designer, could refuse service to a same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Smith and hold that any substantial burden on religion should trigger strict scrutiny under the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm by Joshua Matz
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:19 am by Kiera Flynn
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:31 am by thejaghunter
Morgan making a cell phone call to state officials, during which he made a police report of the incident to Sergeant Kevin Smith of the Tennessee Highway Patrol. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Because AT&T's pension payments accord with a bona fide seniority system's terms, they are insulated from challenge under Title VII §703(h).o May 18, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Noted here: Reuters; Connecticut Employment Law Blog; Yahoo; WAPO; Christian Science Monitor; Bloomberg; Shaw Valenza; NYTimes; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Ross Runkel; Paul Mollica; SCOTUSblog (opinion recap); Fisher… [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]