Search for: "Church v. Grant County" Results 321 - 340 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
  At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the grant in Armstong v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm by Don Cruse
BRAZOS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD FOR BRAZOS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, No. 13-0593 Set to be argued on December 10, 2014 JAW THE POINTE, LLC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm by Cicely Wilson
Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants.Read more: Judges uphold Alameda County drug disposal lawDelay v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
” Summary judgment for the county was affirmed on the employee’s retaliation claim (Davis v Fort Bend County, August 26, 2014, Prado, E). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:07 pm
The ACLU argues that the voucher program violates various provisions of the Colorado Constitution, including article IX (education), section 7: ” Neither the general assembly, nor any county, city, town, township, school district or other public corporation, shall ever make any appropriation, or pay from any public fund or moneys whatever, anything in aid of any church or sectarian society, or for any sectarian purpose, or to help support or sustain any school, academy,… [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
The maps showed the permissible areas and "sensitive receptors" such as schools and churches as well as properties unlikely for commercial development. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Armstrong 13-1056Issue: Whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) authorizes federal courts to hold state officials responsible for remedying alleged ADA violations against parole violators housed in county jails, when state law expressly delegates to the counties sole legal custody and jurisdiction over those parole violators. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
The Court granted cert. in Comptroller v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  The Court’s relist streak continues as this week’s lone grant was again a Relist Watch alumnus: Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:37 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: GILBERT ORTIZ, JR. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:55 am by Eric Rassbach
The majority opinion goes out of its way to negate dictum in County of Allegheny v. [read post]