Search for: "Citizen Action v. DOE" Results 321 - 340 of 6,648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2021, 5:39 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Bordelais v Bordelais, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2021 WL 1554729 (Mem) (7th Cir., 2021) Antoine Bordelais, a French citizen, sought the return of his child under the Hague Convention. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:17 pm by Tom Webley
  The Court rejected Facebook’s argument that the class definition was overly broad and that it had several problems, including that the class definition: (i) has no temporal limitations; (ii) does not address the fact that many users use false names or unidentifiable portraits; (iii) does not address the fact that Sponsored Stories were used for non-commercial entities as well as for businesses; (iv) does not  address the necessary element of lack of… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:05 am by Sansone / Lauber Trial Lawyers
    The post $ 103,000.00 – L.M.S. v Travelers Insurance appeared first on Sansone, Sumner & Lauber. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
Last month’s Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 6:26 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
While this may make sense in the greater scheme of things, it does not seem fair that a government employee can negligently injure a private citizen and that citizen is not entitled to full compensation. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Amy Howe
”  Here Kennedy pointed out that the Constitution protects not only individual rights, but also the collective “right of citizens to debate so they can learn and decide and then, through the political process,” take action together. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:44 am by Sean Wajert
In finding that federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act does not depend on certification, the court joined Vega v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 12:00 pm by JB
Kevin Walsh at the University of Richmond argues that because of previous Supreme Court precedents, subject matter jurisdiction doesn't exist and that the case, Virginia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]