Search for: "Class Action Defense"
Results 321 - 340
of 12,754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2008, 10:30 am
ERISA Class Action Barred by Plaintiff’s Prior Lawsuit Against IBM thus Supporting Defense Motion to Dismiss Class Action New York Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action in New York against his former employer’s pension plan and its administrator alleging violations of ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) by failing to pay him plan benefits. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:07 am
Plaintiffs alleged that a class action could be certified under either Rule 23(b)(2) or (b)(3), and sought pre-certification discovery to support a motion for class action certification. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:08 am
The class action complaint alleged in part various violations of California’s unfair competition law, id., at 9998, and defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court, id., at 10000. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:26 am
Plaintiffs’ moved the trial court to certify the litigation as a class action; defense attorneys opposed class action treatment. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:10 am
By Douglas Weiner A faculty comprised of Defense counsel and Plaintiffs’ counsel presented strategic insights to those who gathered at the American Conference Institute’s 9th National Forum on Wage Hour Claims and Class Actions. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Companies identified exposure as the most important variable they consider when evaluating class action risk. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:28 am
Judicial Panel Grants Request, Unopposed by Defense, for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 5:23 am
Judicial Panel Agrees with Defense that Pretrial Coordination Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 is Warranted for Two State Labor Law Class Action Lawsuits Two class action lawsuits were filed against Terminix in the Central and Northern Districts of California alleging violations of state labor laws for failure to pay overtime to pest control technicians and for misclassifying the class members as exempt employees.. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:21 am
Over Defense Objection Judicial Panel Grants Request for Pretrial Coordination Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and Transfers Class Action Lawsuits to Central District of California Despite Settlement of Action Pending in that District Three class action lawsuits were filed naming Banc of America Investment Services, Quick & Reilly, Fleet National Bank and/or Fleet Investment Services for alleged violations of the federal Fair Labor… [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:33 am
Judicial Panel Grants Request, Unopposed by Defense, for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
Judicial Panel Grants Defense Request for Pretrial Coordination of Individual and Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:04 am
Judicial Panel Grants Defense Request for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:23 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: In our continuing coverage of the top trends found in Seyfarth’s 2022 Workplace Class Action Litigation Report, wage & hour litigation remained the sweet spot for the plaintiffs’ class action bar over the past year. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 8:40 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in the class action certification case of TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 6:12 am
While the class action did not state federal claims, defense attorneys argued that the claims were preempted by the Federal Cable Act, id. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 2:50 pm
Editor’s Note – This article, co-authored by my colleague Tina Amin, is a joint submission to CAB and the BakerHostetler Class Action Lawsuit Defense Blog. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 4:42 am
§ 1407 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; plaintiff lawyers in the other class actions supported the motion, and defense attorneys did not oppose pretrial coordination of the class action litigation but argued that the Southern District of New York was a more appropriate transferee court. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:45 am
Judicial Panel Grants Request, Unopposed by Defense, for Pretrial Coordination of Class Action Lawsuits Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Supreme Court held today that a third-party defendant could not remove a class action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) because the term “defendant” as used in CAFA refers only to the party or parties sued by the original plaintiff. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 10:41 am
Yet again California class action defense attorneys will face more new employment class action claims than any other category. [read post]
