Search for: "Com. v. May"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2020, 2:55 am
This analysis was prepared by a select group of JD candidates at the Institute of International Economic Law (IIEL) at Georgetown University in conjunction with TradeLab. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:54 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:11 pm
On Monday, May 4, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:57 am
Ross relied heavily on an 1888 Supreme Court decision, Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:57 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
On this second day of this unusual May session, the justices will hear – literally, only hear – oral argument in USAID v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:47 pm
The case presents the question of “[w]hether, when the Lanham Act states generic terms may not be registered as trademarks, the addition by an online business of a generic top-level domain (‘.com’) to an otherwise generic term can create a protectable trademark. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Retrial win, to panel’s chagrin.United States v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:51 am
USPTO v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
(Cour de Cassation, Com., 13 September 2011, No. 10-25533), the French Supreme Court upheld the validity of such parallel debt structures. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:27 pm
Com., 564 S.E.2d 144, 38 Va. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:11 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 7:45 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
The Court was sharply divided in Republican National Committee v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
Zippo Dot Com Inc,[7] which rendered the famous Zippo Test. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm
La Quinta Enmienda de la Constitución de Estados Unidos prohíbe compeler el testimonio de una persona hasta llevarlo a incriminarse.[1] Idéntico lenguaje fue adoptado en nuestra Constitución, específicamente, en el Artículo II, § 11.[2] Los forjadores de la Constitución federal adoptaron un concepto del derecho común inglés – el derecho de un individuo a no testificar ni ofrecer evidencia contra sí mismo–… [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
