Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 321 - 340 of 1,983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
Its main argument was that only EU citizens and companies could register such domain names. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am by Matthew D. Lee
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion, overruling long-standing precedent in Roe v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
 (Public Citizen’s post announcing the filing of its amicus brief here.) [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
(pg. 15) - For any claim filed under any policy of Citizens, a public adjuster may not charge, agree to, or accept any compensation, payment, commission, fee, or other thing of value greater than 10% of the additional amount actually paid over the amount that was originally offered by the corporation for any one claim. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
  Since the citizens involved in this suit are not from different states, the only basis for federal jurisdiction is federal question jurisdiction. [read post]
30 May 2014, 5:48 am
Since Google is a private company not the government, my view is this would have simply been a private choice, not a breach in any way of First Amendment, and so viable  (see  CyberPromotions v AOL, waaay back in l996, though have we had the judicial discsusion since as to whether Google is more like a "traditional public form" now than AOL was?) [read post]
The legal question, according to Percoco’s lawyers is, “Does a private citizen who holds no elected office or government employment, but has informal political or other influence over governmental decision making, owe a fiduciary duty to the general public such that he can be convicted of honest-services fraud? [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:59 am by Kristy Parker, Ben Berwick
Or the executives of these companies may feel that they must endorse or show public support for the president to ensure that the company’s employees keep their clearances. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
We reverse, vacate, and remand to the trial court.In Safe Auto Insurance Company v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:13 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
 The article cites a report from the consummer advocacy group, Public Citizen, which found 76 opinions relying on Concepcion as a reason to prevent class actions from “moving ahead. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am by Eric Goldman
As a result, these platforms function in many ways as a 21st century equivalent of the public square. [read post]